MyDD :: Last Call For PUMA Diaries

Last Call For PUMA Diaries

by jsfox, Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 10:05:14 AM EST

It seems the further we get away from the Primary Wars the more we tend to write about or hear from the folks who are still fighting them. So in an effort, to at least, bring the primaries to a close here a last call is going out for PUMA Diaries.

So if you got something to write either against or in favor of the PUMA 15 you have 24 hours to get it out of your system. After 10:00 AM, July 22, 2008 your diary will be ignored.

If you haven't written a PUMA diary before here are some guidelines to make it easier.

First if you are writing a Pro PUMA Diary:

1) You must use sexists, racist, misogynist at least three time in your post.

2) You absolutely must write in such away that opinions come off as facts.

3) Feel free to misquote liberally.

4) Be sure to mention somewhere that Obama must reach out to you. Alternative: Be sure to mention no matter what he does you are not voting for him.

5) A command of proper sentence structure is not a requirement.

6) Extra credit for a drive-by. Whereas you write a diary and note at the bottom you will not be commenting on your diary.

7) Bonus points for trying to explain how your position actually is all about making the Democratic Party better.

8) And the diary must absolutely include that it's not over till the convention!

Guidelines for writing anti-Puma Diaries

1) You must remind readers that PUMA is fronted by a Republican.

2) You must remind us that supporting PUMA is actually anti-Hillary.

3) Be sure to include at least one of the following terms - Wackos, looney toons, crazies, misquided, uninformed. Feel free to add to this list or use all of the terms in one sentence.

4) By all means include the phrase "get over-it."

5) Professing your love for a PUMA (and we all who I am speaking of) is nice, but not requirement.

6) Extra credit for imploring PUMA's to try and rationally explain their position so that you can reach out to them.

Now I am sure I have missed a guideline or two, either for or against. So feel to add your own.

Tags: PUMA, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Snark (all tags)

Permalink :: 84 Comments :: Post a Comment

For Anti-PUMAs, demand they fall in line (2.00 / 7)

insult them into voting Obama. Because that is really effective!

by catfish2 on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 10:17:07 AM EST

Re: For Anti-PUMAs, demand they fall in line (2.00 / 3)

So add this to anti-Puma guideline #3? Or would you like this to be a stand alone?

Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.

by jsfox on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 10:23:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: For Anti-PUMAs, demand they fall in line (2.00 / 4)

Actually, Catfish is cleverly pointing out an omission of yours: required in all pro-Puma diaries (and this is generally a sign of both good writing and well-reasoned arguments) - LOTS of exclamation points.

I'm voting for Saxby Chambliss!

by Jess81 on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 01:08:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: For Anti-PUMAs, demand they fall in line (2.00 / 2)

Catfish's suggestion could also go into the pro-PUMA category.

Insult those who want party unity. Make sweeping generalities about the reasons why they will vote for Obama. Use condescending terms against the entire concept of unity in general(kumbaya..etc..). And for god's sake make sure you make some references to religious zealotry.

by Tenafly Viper on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 03:32:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: For Anti-PUMAs, demand they fall in line (2.00 / 5)

We don't need their vote AT ALL.

What we need to raise US voter turnout just 5%, that guarantees Obama and the Dems a crushing victory.

by DemsLandslide2008 on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 10:23:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Not asking for your vote. (2.00 / 9)

Just asking you to stop trolling a Democratic website. The Republicans generally oblige, and there are a lot more of them than there are of you.

by Geekesque on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 10:27:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: For Anti-PUMAs, demand they fall in line (2.00 / 5)

Allow me to jump on the "we don't want your vote" bandwagon!

Seriously, there's like what, 2 dozen PUMA's? And like 90% of them are Dixiecrat bigots, so it is with great pleasure I tell PUMA's to piss off.

Two riders were approaching......the wind begins to howl!

by John in Chicago on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 11:14:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: For Anti-PUMAs, demand they fall in line (2.00 / 2)

Yep. Definitely don't want their votes. Mostly mentally ill dixiecrat racists anyway...

by Lance Bryce on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 11:49:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: For Anti-PUMAs, demand they fall in line (2.00 / 5)

I don't insult them in order to get them to vote for Obama. I insult them because I know they'll be voting for McBush regardless.

by Beren on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 12:55:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: For Anti-PUMAs, demand they fall in line (1.25 / 4)

Just so we know who is giving mojo to catfish

Others have rated this comment as follows:
campskunk 2
cameoanne

by venician on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 12:56:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: For Anti-PUMAs, demand they fall in line (2.00 / 1)

Hey I mojo'd him for adding to the list :)

Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.

by jsfox on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 01:04:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Catfish didn't you mean to say (none / 0)

"me". As in you can't insult me into voting for Obama.

"me, me me"

overthrow the government~participate

by missliberties on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 02:49:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: For Anti-PUMAs, demand they fall in line (2.00 / 2)

Wait, you (and other PUMAs) choose who to vote against over a bunch of anonymous internet folks making fun of you?

Well damn, let's see if I can push you towards Obama... here it goes... Hey Catfish, I'm a McCain supporter and I think your face looks like a cows butt!!!

Did it work?

Ornithological Vaccinations and Aviary Heuristics

by OVAH on Tue Jul 22, 2008 at 12:18:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Ha-le-freakin'-leu-jah! And, amen! n/t (2.00 / 8)

by bobswern on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 10:18:28 AM EST

One quibble: PUMA's don't talk about racism (2.00 / 5)

There is no racism in their world. Instead, there is only whiny Obama supporters 'playing the race card.'

These people adore Harriet Christian.

by Geekesque on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 10:26:21 AM EST

Re: One quibble: PUMA's don't talk about racism (none / 0)

Not sure about your quibble, but I will defend your right to have them to the death!

Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.

by jsfox on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 10:30:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: One quibble: PUMA's don't talk about racism (2.00 / 2)

He's referring to the standard rejoinder that it was Obama, the ostensible victim, that was cynically manipulating issues of race because his campaign issued a memo outlining questionable statement. This is a bit like blaming a rape victim for contacting the authorities or for how she dressed.

by Philoguy on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 02:20:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: One quibble: PUMA's don't talk about racism (2.00 / 3)

Correction: a staffer from his campaign in South Carolina made a list of so called 'racist remarks'. It was disowned and discredited by the Obama campaign which - for the record - has never accused anyone of racism and has distanced itself from supporters who have.

Even the Ferraro remarks were simply called by Obama 'divisive' and taken in the same spirit as his grandmother's off-colored remarks.

Let's keep the record straight. I'm tired of the 'reverse racist smear' of two months ago

BTW: an accusation that Obama played the race card first is a mandatory requirement of a PUMA diary

by duende on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 03:32:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: One quibble: PUMA's don't talk about racism (2.00 / 4)

and then a play of the gender card is required within two sentences

by wrb on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 03:44:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (2.00 / 13)

I think you left out a few pointers:

Pro-PUMA:

9) Always refer to Obama as "Bambi," "Barry," "Barky," or some variant (bonus points for quasi-racism).

10) Make sure to include some list of demands, especially if fueled by a rumor campaign (such as the DNC ballot nonsense).

11) Never refer to PUMA by its full name, "Party Unity My Ass" - it sort of cedes the maturity angle.

Anti-PUMA:

7) Note how childish it would be for someone to vote based on how "mean" somebody else was to them online.

by rfahey22 on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 10:26:55 AM EST

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (2.00 / 4)

Good adds!

Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.

by jsfox on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 10:30:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (2.00 / 13)

One more:

12) Always remind people that "there are millions of us."

by rfahey22 on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 10:31:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (2.00 / 1)

13) Conflate the 18 million voters who supported Clinton with the PUMA movement despite polling to the contrary.

14) Claim that the polls are a part of a rightwing, Obamacan conspiracy.

by Philoguy on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 02:21:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (none / 0)

But then the anti-PUMA diaries would have to include reminding people that at least 16 million of the most ardent supporters of Hillary Clinton agree with Hillary herself and they support Obama for the same reasons they supported Hillary then and now.

by Jeter on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 09:27:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (2.00 / 4)

On number 9, you forgot to mention that you can never say "Barack Obama", it has to be "Barack Hussein Obama", even if that means changing the unfortunate initials BO into the less connotative BHO.

It's the principle of the thing. We couldn't possibly vote for a President who doesn't use a middle name.

by TCQuad on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 10:50:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (2.00 / 2)

A good add and so noted.

Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.

by jsfox on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 10:52:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

nah. (2.00 / 3)

ive got in hot water for saying BO as well. so i guess that one will have to be with a caveat.

"Democracy! Bah! When I hear that I reach for my feather Boa!" Allen Ginsberg

by canadian gal on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 10:56:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: nah. (2.00 / 2)

fair enough

Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.

by jsfox on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 10:58:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: nah. (2.00 / 1)

Lol, yeah! I got a message on a newspaper board deleted (Jake Tapper's) for saying "I always thought BHO was more polite than BO because when I was growing up BO meant Body Odor."

I was just pointing out what I thought was well-known and obvious and it got deleted!

The initials thing is totally loony.

by SuGeAtARC on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 11:49:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

You are so right. (none / 0)

The minister at my church when I was a child was about to have his first child. He was talking about trying to pick a name. One of the things he said was they wanted to be careful that they didn't pick a name where the initials would spell out something unfortunate. Too bad Barack's Mom didn't go to my church. I bet he took his share of ribbing over his initials when he was young.

That One is the Right One for 2008.

by GFORD on Tue Jul 22, 2008 at 03:06:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (2.00 / 1)

"The
Precious" is particularly clever

by wrb on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 02:42:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

yay! (1.83 / 6)

see - i wouldn't mind an honest and responsible look at PUMA - but none of the diaries here do it. its just a your hilarious diary purports - a flame war with some humour.

anyway highly rec'd!

"Democracy! Bah! When I hear that I reach for my feather Boa!" Allen Ginsberg

by canadian gal on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 10:31:25 AM EST

Re: yay! (2.00 / 6)

honest and responsible look

Sorry the above is NOT in the guidelines and sorry to say this type of thinking is frowned upon.

Please try to keep this mind ;)

Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.

by jsfox on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 10:37:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: yay! (2.00 / 3)

Well it might be interesting to some to have an actual, factual (I'm a poet and didn't know it) diary, I could not care less about them.

Except to make fun of their childish "we want this or else" behavior.

Two riders were approaching......the wind begins to howl!

by John in Chicago on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 11:17:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: yay! (none / 0)

Interesting maybe, likely to happen......

doubtful.

Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.

by jsfox on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 11:24:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

You hit the nail on the head. (none / 0)

There is something infantile about these tantrums. I have never had my first choice win the Democratic nomination...ever...including this time. And I have yet to throw a tantrum and march around in the streets with a homemade sign over it.

I would die of shame if my grandchildren ever saw a video of me making such a fool of myself, acting like a spoiled 2-year-old in public. But hey, that's just me.

That One is the Right One for 2008.

by GFORD on Tue Jul 22, 2008 at 03:20:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You hit the nail on the head. (none / 0)

This is the first time my first choice ever one.

But to be honest, the two things that first drew me to Obama were not political at all. He's from my state, so an Obama presidency would be a boon for Illinois, and he's a White Sox fan!

But then after the primaries got closer and I started studying his positions more, he remained my #1 choice.

But yeah, I was burned in the past supporting Dean, and Bradley beofre- and the though never even crossed my mind to say "I wont vote for XXXX unless he puts YYYY on the ballot!". I just sucked it up and went to work for the Nominee.

After you get past policy positions, one of the other things that makes me support someone, and I know purists won't love this, is that I want someone who can win. Obama, from day one, has always come across as the guy who could win it.

Two riders were approaching......the wind begins to howl!

by John in Chicago on Tue Jul 22, 2008 at 05:54:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (2.00 / 6)

pretty funny and spot on

President-elect Barack Obama spent the day thanking the people who helped him win the election. Obama's first phone call was to Sarah Palin.

by wellinformed on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 10:56:37 AM EST

does this mean cougar and Jaguar diaries (2.00 / 6)

can still be posted?

by Dog Chains on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 11:32:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: does this mean cougar and Jaguar diaries (2.00 / 5)

Ocelot and Lynx are also still acceptable, yes.

by SuGeAtARC on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 11:50:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (none / 0)

ah just what this Monday needed, yet another in the intermidable line of PUMA-centric diaries. yeah, THIS will make them go away...

by zerosumgame on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 11:34:30 AM EST

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (2.00 / 3)

Maybe a guideline should be added for both types.

A complete loss of one's sense of humor is a must.

Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.

by jsfox on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 12:00:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (none / 0)

Heh, heh, heh. How on earth did you forget that one?

The Moose is on the loose. "And I scream at the top of my lungs, what's going on?"

by Hollede on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 02:08:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (none / 0)

Is your brother one of "them"?
:::wink,wink,nudge:::

"Who are you for? That is the wrong question. It should be who is for you?" HRC

by skohayes on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 07:52:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (none / 0)

Wait you know my brother? And no fortunately he has become an Obamacan.

Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.

by jsfox on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 08:50:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (2.00 / 8)

Could we add a "hilarious mocking of ex-site heavyweights because nobody will ever take them seriously ever again" corollary?

Serious question- Is This Snark?

by ragekage on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 11:40:36 AM EST

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (2.00 / 5)

Only if we add something about "former" members of the community who do drive-by recs in order to dominate the rec list, in accordance with some signal sent out by their collective.

by rfahey22 on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 11:47:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (2.00 / 1)

Oooh, good idea, that.

Serious question- Is This Snark?

by ragekage on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 02:05:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (none / 0)

There should be a daily Puma, Anti-Puma and Puma commentary section.

Seems there are at least 1 diary a day that is puma centric in some fashion...

by dtaylor2 on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 11:46:12 AM EST

Mention PUMAs' 40 cat per home average (2.00 / 2)

by Lance Bryce on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 11:47:45 AM EST

Re: Mention PUMAs' 40 cat per home average (2.00 / 2)

Mention that anti-PUMA diaries must claim that all PUMAs are fat ugly crazy cat ladies.

by SuGeAtARC on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 11:50:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Mention PUMAs' 40 cat per home average (none / 0)

Definitely gotta mention that because it's true!

by Lance Bryce on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 12:03:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (2.00 / 6)

Obligatory addition to the Anti Puma diary:

The diary itself must be strewn with incendiary dismissive comments by zerosumgame, rankles, or one of their amended sockpuppets, otherwise... what's the point?

by duende on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 11:50:06 AM EST

Re: Last Call For PUMA Diaries (2.00 / 2)

And it must be the first comment, just so we all know their collective anti-anti-PUMA senses are working and they're all OK.

by TCQuad on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 11:56:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

whta you personally have against PUMA? (none / 0)

more diaries like yours will get more votes for McCain.
BTW I prefer UMA as a TLA instead of fuzzy PUMA.

Welcome to a Landslide without white Working class, Latinos, Women, Seniors and holding-on sweeties

by engels on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 12:08:22 PM EST

Re: whta you personally have against PUMA? (none / 0)

Even though I said it was unnecessary - we do love you Engles.

Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.

by jsfox on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 12:22:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: whta you personally have against PUMA? (2.00 / 1)

You do understand what UMA stands for?

"Unite my ass".

Engels has not yet caught on to the grammatical hilarity of it, despite the fact that it's been met with guffaws all over the internets. Even holding-on sweeties think it's funny.

I'm voting for Saxby Chambliss!

by Jess81 on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 01:13:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: whta you personally have against PUMA? (none / 0)

I actually claim credit for UMA. I gave engels the idea, and therefore if the contract negotiations work out and Ms. Thurman agrees to allow the use of her name in political ads, I want 15%.

And so, may evil beware and may good dress warmly and eat lots of fresh vegetables.

by thatpurplestuff on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 01:19:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: whta you personally have against PUMA? (none / 0)

The 'monobutt' faction. Wow. Hard to pass on that.

by Shaun Appleby on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 06:23:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Obama Prohibiting Protest Banners in Berlin (none / 0)

http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/politik/200 8/07/21/obama-verbietet/schilder-bei-sei ner-berlinrede.html

This is completely consistent with the slant of this diary -- no banners or placards being allowed at Obama's Berlin speech.

What will his key line be:

Ich bin ein Zensor?

by strongerthandirt on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 12:15:52 PM EST

Re: Obama Prohibiting (2.00 / 3)

Staying on message is good.

Wastes of time such as yourself are doubleplusungood.

by Reaper0Bot0 on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 12:48:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

And then there's this LA Times story (none / 0)

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washingt on/2008/07/obama-newyorker.html

Title:

In satirical payback, Obama camp denies New Yorker writer plane seat

by strongerthandirt on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 12:22:10 PM EST

Re: And then there's this LA Times story (2.00 / 2)

Damned right. Nobody owes them a seat.

by Reaper0Bot0 on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 12:48:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And then there's this LA Times story (2.00 / 1)

That's actually incredibly funny. As long as they say the whole thing is satire, they're in the clear.

I'm voting for Saxby Chambliss!

by Jess81 on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 01:16:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And then there's this LA Times story (none / 0)

Aww, poor guy, can't the New Yorker take a joke?
It's a joke, man, maybe next time!
Of course, there were also 150 other reporters that didn't get to go (200 news outlets applied for 50 seats set aside for press), so they're in some good company, I'm sure.

"Who are you for? That is the wrong question. It should be who is for you?" HRC

by skohayes on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 08:02:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Math challenged much? (2.00 / 2)

200 people applied for 50 seats on the plane.

This means that there was a 75% chance that exactly this would happen.

If candidates kicked off members of every press outlet that said something they didn't like, the planes would be empty.

by Geekesque on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 12:49:35 PM EST

Perspective challenged. (none / 0)

Probably has something to do with that pole (or whatever it is they have) up the ass.

It is not because I cannot explain that you won't understand. It is because you won't understand that I cannot explain. - Elie Wiesel

by Sumo Vita on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 05:14:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

A REAL PUMA RALLY! (2.00 / 1)

Video of PUMA, Just Say No Deal Hold A Protest

http://sensico.wordpress.com/2008/07/19/ video-of-puma-just-say-no-deal-losers-ho ld-a-protest/

"Its like 10 or less people standing on the streets, not even being enthusiastic about "fighting the cause", greatest loser video ever. These people are losers without a cause. They should be fighting against something important, like ending global warming, or freeing Tibet, not holding on to a lost cause that Hillary could still win. Even Hillary has moved on, shes busy trying to win her senate seat in New York, why don't the PUMA people help Hillary raise money for that. OMG I could seriously sit here and trash them all day, and trust me I would love to do this, but the video speaks for itself, courtesy of The Anti-PUMA"

by Mae Scott on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 12:55:44 PM EST

Re: A REAL PUMA RALLY! (2.00 / 3)

Wow that was... that's when you put the signs away and see if you have enough people for a bridge game.

If that was 10, then I'm G. Gordon Liddy.

I'm voting for Saxby Chambliss!

by Jess81 on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 01:29:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A REAL PUMA RALLY! (2.00 / 2)

I think more folks on the street would have paid attention to them if they had been playing bridge.

Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.

by jsfox on Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 01:45:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A REAL PUMA RALLY! (2.00 / 2)

That video was really hard to watch.